Max Steiner was born in Sacramento, California. Steiner served in the U.S. Army from 2005 to 2009 and has served in the U.S. Army Reserve. He earned a degree from the University of California at Berkeley in 2011. Steiner's career experience includes working as a diplomat with the Foreign Service and a policy analyst with the RAND Corporation.
egal abortion services until viability regardless of their state of residence. We need to codify Roe v. Wade into law.
Transition the Forest Service from USDA to the Department of Interior – where it would join the Bureau of Land Management and the National Park Service in managing our natural resources.
Spend $1 billion/year to subsidize the start-up costs and streamline the regulations for greater mill capacity and responsible logging in the North State. This will include market interventions to make American timber more competitive. We have too much biomass in our forests and we need to incentivize the market to thin the small, crowded trees that threaten our communities.
Ease the NEPA process to allow large-scale forest management plans: we need to be approving and executing 100,000-acre-plus treatment plans that acknowledge the catastrophic risks of a “no-treatment” alternative.
more smaller platforms like helicopters and single-engine air-tankers distributed around the nation and crewed/maintained by full-time federal personnel. Large, contracted air tankers have a place in the firefighting task organization; but they are expensive and lack flexibility.
The best thing the federal government can do for California’s water crisis is to fund more dams.
If you think that California’s water problem can be solved with only dams: you are wrong. The changing climate means that the water is not there. If you think that you can solve California’s water problem with only water restrictions: you’re equally wrong. You will bankrupt farmers and destroy California’s agricultural industry.
We know, given climate change, that we will have these droughts in the future: the economics of these projects are clear, and every acre-foot of surface water capacity represents a foot less of groundwater users will need to pump.
Doug LaMalfa likes to claim that he knows water because he has a family tradition of using water. That is like a fox saying he should be in charge of the henhouse because he comes from a long line of foxes. The Steiners have a tradition of actually solving water problems in the West. My grand-uncle, Wesley Steiner, was Deputy Director of the California Department of Water Resources before becoming DWR Director in Arizona. There, he angered anti-infrastructure environmentalists by building the Central Arizona Project aqueduct, which moves 1.5 million acre-feet/year. He also angered agricultural interests by writing the first Groundwater Management Act in the country.
I hope you will give me a chance to carry on the Steiner family’s tradition of solving water issues in the West through intelligent, balanced policymaking.
Policy Proposals:
As the American officer in charge of agricultural affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Honduras, I helped American farmers export rice, potatoes, and beef products even as local producers tried to get around the protections granted by CAFTA (The Central American Free Trade Agreement). I know the challenges that American producers face in exporting overseas and I know how to fight for you.
As your Congressman, I will support farmers in the district who have trouble penetrating the maze of American agricultural bureaucracy in Washington, D.C.
The farmers of this district don’t need a Congressman that knows how to farm – they’re not turning to D.C. for help with farming. The farmers of this district need a Congressman who understands how to solve bureaucratic problems.
I’m not a farmer, but I know how to support farmers through policy.
Policy Proposal:
Unlike Doug LaMalfa, I have fought for my country. Moreover, as an Army Reservist, I stand ready to fight for America again. We have been ill-served by a Congress full of armchair generals and think-tank strategists, who have wasted countless dollars and lives on ill-fated interventions overseas.
The American military protects American interests. Sometimes that means protecting willing allies against foreign aggression. It does not mean nation building. We do not incur a Responsibility To Protect. Our soldiers are the cream of our society – and we must use them sparingly and decisively to secure an American future.
Just as our military must remain a last resort, our diplomatic efforts overseas must remain proactively engaged on the front lines of foreign affairs. I have served as a diplomat in Honduras, Mexico, Egypt, and Washington, D.C. I know the issues, I know the questions to ask, and I know what can reasonably be asked of the diplomatic service.
We are facing the threat of a rising China: a totalitarian regime singularly focused on the rules-based international order that cost half a million American lives in World War Two. We cannot squander the blood and sacrifices of our forefathers by retreating to isolationism. Nor can we embrace a self-congratulatory complacence in which we assume that the liberal democratic order will effortlessly persevere.
We live in the real world: where evil regimes stand ready to destroy everything we stand for. We need fighters in Congress that know the stakes.
We have a fire problem in the North State because we have a forest management problem, and the crux of the problem is that there is too much biomass in our forests.
We need to cut down many of the small- and medium-sized trees to create space. This space will facilitate tree growth and fire safety, while generating responsible, renewable revenues for property owners. Our forests are a resource, but they are also increasingly a risk: we can manage that risk better through better policies.
Public discourse on this topic has too often been ruined by simplistic, sound-bite-ready policies on both sides of the political aisle. We can’t solve forestry with soundbites. My brother lost his house in Redding to the Carr fire: I have skin in the game, and I know that the status quo is unacceptable.
Policy Proposals:
We need a more flexible way to manage wildland firefighters. We need pre-trained, part-time crews that the government can activate as needed.
Fires are a national security problem, that are hard to predict, with a straightforward – though physically demanding – training pipeline. I’ve spent 10 years in the Army Reserves: this is literally the same set of problems that the Reserves and Guard were designed to solve. War is rare, unpredictable, and requires a country to have trained soldiers before it starts. We should use the military reserve/guard force structure as a model and apply it to the way we fight fires.
Policy Proposals:
Biden’s Infrastructure and Investment Jobs Act allocated $3.3 billion to wildfire risk reduction over five years: about $660 million/year. It’s a well-intentioned start – and much more than the Republican Party was willing to spend – but it is insufficient.
We need a dedicated national effort to reduce the destructive impacts of uncontrolled wildfires. This will require an aggressive commitment by lawmakers to fund more firefighters, with more equipment, in more places. Just as importantly, lawmakers need to force USFS/BLM/NPS to change their culture from “managing fire” to “putting fires out and managing forests”.
Policy Proposals
We need a more flexible way to manage wildland firefighters. We need pre-trained, part-time crews that the government can activate as needed.
Fires are a national security problem, that are hard to predict, with a straightforward – though physically demanding – training pipeline. I’ve spent 10 years in the Army Reserves: this is literally the same set of problems that the Reserves and Guard were designed to solve. War is rare, unpredictable, and requires a country to have trained soldiers before it starts. We should use the military reserve/guard force structure as a model and apply it to the way we fight fires.
Policy Proposals:
As the American officer in charge of agricultural affairs at the U.S. Embassy in Honduras, I helped American farmers export rice, potatoes, and beef products even as local producers tried to get around the protections granted by CAFTA (The Central American Free Trade Agreement). I know the challenges that American producers face in exporting overseas and I know how to fight for you.
As your Congressman, I will support farmers in the district who have trouble penetrating the maze of American agricultural bureaucracy in Washington, D.C.
The farmers of this district don’t need a Congressman that knows how to farm – they’re not turning to D.C. for help with farming. The farmers of this district need a Congressman who understands how to solve bureaucratic problems.
I know how to support farmers through policy.
Policy Proposals:
Sixteen years ago I swore an oath to defend American democracy against all enemies “foreign and domestic” – I intend to keep that oath.
In 2020, the Republican Party lost the Presidential election and refused to accept the results. Doug LaMalfa and 133 other Republicans voted against certifying the results. Now the GOP is trying to rewrite state laws to ensure that their next attempt to steal an election is successful. This is unacceptable. Our democracy depends upon politicians respecting the results of free and fair elections.
The response of the Democratic Party and the Biden Administration to this attack on our democracy has been pitiful. Working on an infrastructure bill means nothing if democracy dies. Democrats need to fight to defend our right to vote. Too many incumbent Democrats are too comfortable, too complacent, or too old to fight for democracy. I am not a do-nothing Democrat. I have fought for democracy in Iraq and I intend to fight for democracy in Congress.
Policy Proposals:
Our constitutional rights define who we are as Americans. They are not set in stone – note the 17 additional amendments made since the original 10 – but neither should we allow them to be undermined through onerous legislative restrictions. I feel that too many Americans “support the Constitution” only when it tells them what they want to hear. We see this disappointing hypocrisy most clearly in “left-wing” restrictions on Americans’ Second Amendment right to bear arms and in “right-wing” restrictions on Americans’ Fourth Amendment right to privacy and personal choice in pregnancy.
Outlawing guns will not end gun violence any more than outlawing abortion will end abortion.
Policy Proposals:
As a U.S. diplomat in Honduras and Mexico, I saw the impacts of our immigration policy first-hand. It is inefficient, inhumane, and it needs substantial changes.
Those immigrants who are trying to enter illegally are not bad people, but they are breaking the law. There are far more people who want to enter the United States – in the search of a better life for themselves and their family – than the United States can reasonably admit. There will need to be limits. Those limits will need to be enforced at the border and through deportation activities within the U.S. itself.
Policy Proposals: